ESP 169: Water Policy and Politics

Spring 2008

 

Professor Mark Lubell

Email:  mnlubell@ucdavis.edu

Webpage:  http://www.des.ucdavis.edu/faculty/lubell/

Office Hours:  Tuesday-Thursday, 1-3pm; 2146 Wickson or by appointment

 

Class Logistics

Time:  Tuesday/Thursday, 10:30-11:50

Lecture Location:  PHYGEO 148

 

Abstract

 

Water is a necessary—but scarce—resource.  It is not always available when and where people demand it, people do many things to degrade water quality, and people sometimes fight over it.  Therefore, water requires the creation of government institutions that establish rules for using water and decision-making procedures for changing those rules.  This class examines the policy and politics of water, including issues of water pollution/quality and water supply.  We will focus mainly on the rules governing how water is used, the politics of water decision-making, and whether or not the rules are effective at providing adequate amounts of clean water for human consumption and ecosystem maintenance.  While the broad focus is on US Federal water policy, we will also use case studies from California and other US watersheds.  We will also take a brief excursion (time permitting) into international aspects of water policy, including water conflict and water supply issues in developing countries.  Students should leave the class with a broad understanding of water policy in the United States, and enough information to pursue more specific details and research projects in the course of their academic or professional careers.   

 

Administrative Details

 

Course grading consists of three elements, which is scored on a 200-point scale: mid-term examination (25%, or 50pts), final examination (25%, 50pts), watershed scoping project (40%, or 80pts), and class participation (10%, or 20pts).  The mid-term and final will focus on concepts presented in lecture, and will be a combination of short answer and multiple choice.  The watershed scoping (click here to see guidelines) is a watershed management exercise focusing on a specific watershed in California; more guidance and training for the paper will be provided in class.  Class participation requires attendance of lectures and especially active participation in class discussion, including bringing in ideas from the readings.  The exam times and paper due dates are as follows:

 

 

Midterm Examination:  Tuesday, April 29

Final Examination:  Saturday, Jun 7,  3:30-5:30pm (Exam Code “D”; location is same room)

Watershed Summary Due:  Thursday, May 8 (click here to see guidelines)

Watershed Scoping Project Due:  Thursday, May 22

Team Presentations:  Tuesday, June 3 and Thursday, June 5

 

Cheating and Late Work Policies

 

If you are caught cheating on an examination, you will receive a zero for that exam.  Given the fact that the exams are at least 25% of your grade, a zero on one exam almost guarantees you a D or F in the class unless you are perfect on the other materials.  Do not plagiarize research materials for your papers.  There should be no quotes without citations, and all references should be given credit.  This includes Internet materials.  Plagiarized papers will also receive a zero.  If any cheating is egregious enough, I will report the offender to the appropriate campus authorities for disciplinary action.  Lesson:  Don’t cheat.

 

Late papers or missed exams will only be allowed with a written documentation of a medical or some other personal emergency.  Otherwise, there will be no making up exams.  If you turn in the paper late without an excuse, you will lose one letter grade for each day it is late.


 

Required Reading Materials

 

Wilkinson, Charles.  1993.  Crossing the Next Meridian:  Land, Water, and the Future of the West.  Covelo, CA: Island Press  (ISBN:  155963149X)

 

Hundley, Norris.  2001.  The Great Thirst: Californians and Water-A History (Revised Edition).  Berkeley, CA: University of California Press (ISBN:  0520224566).

 

California Water News Listserver:  http://listhost1.water.ca.gov/mailman/listinfo/water_news

 

Additional required online readings listed for each week.

 

Introduction

 

Tuesday 4/1: Introduction

 

Watershed Academy Exercise

 

Jonathan P. Deason, Theodore M. Schad and George William Sherk.  2001.  “Water Policy in the United States: A Perspective.”  Water Policy 3:  175-192

 

Gerlak, Andrea K.  2006.  “Federalism and US Water Policy: Lessons for the 21st Century.”  Publius: The Journal of Federalism

 

Gleick, Peter H. "Water Use." Annual Review of Environment and Resources 28, no. 1 (2003): 275-314.

 

Political Economics of Water

 

Thursday, 4/3: Externalities, Common Pool Resources

 

Hardin, Garrett.  1968.  “The Tragedy of the Commons.”  Science 162: 1243-1248.   (JSTOR)

Ostrom, Elinor.  1990.  Chapter 4 from Governing the Commons (Handout from professor)

Assignment of watershed teams

 

Tuesday, 4/8:  Games Water Users Play

 

Ostrom, Elinor, and Roy Gardner.  1993.  “Coping with Asymmetries in the Commons: Self-Governing Irrigation Systems Can Work.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 7 (4): 93-112. (JSTOR)

 

Water Quality and Drinking Water

 

Thursday, 4/10:  Clean Water Act Overview

 

Congressional Research Service Report, “Implementing the Clean Water Act.”

Knopman, Debra S. and Richard A. Smith. "20 Years of the Clean Water Act, Has U.S. Water Quality Improved?" Environment. v. 31, no. 1, January/February 1993. pp. 16-20, 34-41.

Tuesday, 4/15: Drinking Water

 

EPA’s Drinking Water Academy: EPA Training Materials for Safe Drinking Water Act

http://www.epa.gov/safewater/dwa/electronic/ematerials.html#sdwa

 

 

 

 

Watershed Training and Wetlands

 

Thursday  4/17: Conceptual Model Training

Fraser Shilling, Trainer

Chapter 2, California Watershed Assessment Manual (http://www.cwam.ucdavis.edu/Volume_2/CWAM_II_1_Indicators.doc)

Conceptual Ecological Models in the Everglades (http://www.bioone.org/archive/0277-5212/25/4/pdf/i0277-5212-25-4-795.pdf)

 

Heemskerk, M., K Wilson and M Pavao-Zuckerman. 2003. “Conceptual models as tools for communication across disciplines”.  Conservation Ecology 7(3)

 

 Tuesday 4/22: Wetlands

 

Congressional Research Service Report, "Wetlands Issues"

 

Water Rights and Water Organizations

 

Thursday 4/24: Water Rights and Water Supply Organizations

 

Hundley, Chapters 3, 4

CA Water Rights Summary:

http://www.norcalwater.org/pdf/D121205pmbWaterRightsSummary.pdf

 

Tuesday 4/29:  Midterm Exam!!!

 

 

Water Management in California

 

Thursday 5/1:  California Water Overview

Hundley, Chapters 5,6,7          

 

California Water Plan:  Overview of California Water Management

http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/docs/cwpu2005/Vol_4/01-Background/V4PRD6-waterallocation.pdf

 

 

Tuesday 5/6:  Guest Lecture on Marine Protected Areas, Professor Jim Sanchirico

 

 

Thursday 5/8: Colorado River

 

Wilkinson, Chapter 1, 6

Hundley 5,6,7 (information on Colorado River interspersed)

Marston, Ed.  “Quenching the Big Thirst”  High Country News http://www.hcn.org/servlets/hcn.Article?article_id=10516

 

WATERSHED SUMMARY DUE THURSDAY 5/8

 

Water and Biodiversity

 

Tuesday 5/13:  Policy Overview

 

Richter, Brian D.; David P. Braun; Michael A. Mendelson; Lawrence L. Master. 1997.  “Threats to Imperiled Freshwater Fauna.”  Conservation Biology 11 (5):  1081-1093.(JSTOR)

 

Myers and Worm. 2002.  Rapid Worldwide Depletion of Predatory Fish Communities.  Nature

 

Thursday 5/15:  Salmon, Steelhead, and Western Rivers

 

Wilkinson, Chapter 5

 

The Columbia River System Inside Story

http://www.bpa.gov/power/pg/columbia_river_inside_story.pdf

 

Water and Ecosystem Management

 

Tuesday 5/20: Politics of Ecosystem Management

 

Heikkila, Tanya, and Andrea Gerlak.  2005.  “The Formation of Large-Scale Collaborative Resource Management Instituions:  Clarifying the Roles Stakeholders, Science, and Institutions.”  Policy Studies Journal 33(4)

 

Thursday 5/22: Chesapeake Bay and Everglades Case Studies

 

Congressional Research Service, “South Florida Ecosystem Restoration and CERP”

http://www.cnie.org/nle/crsreports/biodiversity/biodv-38.pdf

 

Chesapeake Bay Program

http://www.chesapeakebay.net/

 

WATERSHED SCOPING DUE 5/22!!!

 

International Water Issues

 

Tuesday 5/27:  Water Development and Conflict

 

Gleick, Peter H.  2003.  Global Freshwater Resources:  Soft-Path Solutions for the Twenty First CenturyScience 302:  1524-1528.

 

Wolf, Aaron T. 1998.  "Conflict and Cooperation along International Waterways."  Water Policy (1) 2: 251-265. PDF (490 K)

 

Gerlak, Andrea.  2004.  “The Global Environment Facility and Transboundary Water Resource Management: New Institutional Arrangements in the Danube River and Black Sea Region.”  Journal of Environmental and Development

 

Thursday 5/29:  Overflow Day

 

Team Presentations

 

Tuesday 6/3: Team Presentations of Watershed Scoping

 

Thursday 6/5: Team Presentations of Watershed Scoping

Final Examination:  Saturday, June 7. 3:30-5pm.

 


Recommended Additional Readings

 

Political Economics of Water

 

Heikkila, Tanya.  2004.  “Institutional Boundaries and Common-Pool Resource Management: A Comparative Analysis of Water Management Programs in California”. 

Tang, SY.  1991. “Institutional Arrangements and the Management of Common Pool Resources.”  Public Administration Review.

Ostrom, Elinor; James Walker; Roy Gardner.  1992.  “Covenants With and Without a Sword: Self-Governance is Possible.”  The American Political Science Review  86(2):  404-417. (JSTOR)

 

Water Quality

 

Congressional Research Service Report, “Clean Water Act and Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs)of Pollutants.” 

 

Congressional Research Service Report "The Clean Water Act: A Summary"

 

Andreen, William L.  “The Evolution of Water Pollution Control in the United States—State Local and Federal Efforts 1789-1972: Part I.”  Stanford Environmental Law Journal 22:  145-?

 

EPA’s Watershed Academy:  Introduction to the Clean Water Act

http://www.epa.gov/watertrain/cwa/

 

California State Water Resources Control Board

http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/index.html

 

Wetlands

 

GAO Report:  Wetlands Overview: Problems With Acreage Data Persist TEXT , PDF , SUMMARY

 

CRS Report:  The Supreme Court Addresses Corps of Engineers Jurisdiction Over "Isolated Waters": The SWANCC Decision (http://www.ncseonline.org/nle/crsreports/risk/rsk-56.cfm?&CFID=5048247&CFTOKEN=34032911)

 

Water Rights and Water Supply Organizations

 

Kanazawa, Mark T.  1998.  “Efficiency in Western Water Law:  The Development of the California Doctrine, 1850-1911.”  The Journal of Legal Studies 27: 159-?

 

Blumm, Michael C., and Thea Schwartz.  1995.  “Mono Lake and the Evolving Public Trust Doctrine in Western Water.”  Arizona Law Review 37:  701-?

 

Overview of California Water Law

http://ceres.ca.gov/theme/env_law/water_law/ (this link may be broken)

 

Overview of California Water Rights Process

http://www.waterrights.ca.gov/html/wr_process.htm

 

Metropolitan Water District of Southern California

http://www.mwdh2o.com/

 

Imperial Irrigation District

http://www.iid.com/

 

California Association of Water Agencies:  Overview of Water Districts

http://www.acwanet.com/mediazone/waterfacts/view.asp?ID=51

 

NRLC Groundwater Law Sourcebook (Very good!)

http://www.colorado.edu/Law/centers/nrlc/publications/Groundwater%20Law%20Sourcebook.pdf

 


California/Western Water History

 

Copyright (c) 2000 Hastings College of the Law Hastings West-Northwest Journal of Environmental Law and Policy,  Winter / Spring, 2000,  6 Hastings W.-N.W. J. Env. L. & Pol'y 117,  29973 words,  ARTICLE: Who Controls the Waters? Incorporating Environmental and Social Values in Water Resources Planning,  By James P. Morris *

 

Copyright (c) 2001 Golden Gate University Golden Gate University,  Spring, 2001,  31 Golden Gate U.L. Rev. 331,  7252 words,  ARTICLE: FIXING THE DELTA: THE CALFED BAY-DELTA PROGRAM AND WATER POLICY UNDER THE DAVIS ADMINISTRATION,  By Patrick Wright*

 

Western Water Policy Review Advisory Commission Reports

https://repository.unm.edu/handle/1928/363

 

California Department of Water Resources (State Water Project)

http://wwwdwr.water.ca.gov/

 

US Bureau of Reclamation, Mid-Pacific Region (Central Valley Project)

http://www.usbr.gov/mp/

 

California State Water Plan 1998:  Institutional Framework for Allocating and Managing Water Resources in California

http://rubicon.water.ca.gov/pdfs/v1/v1ap2a.pdf

 

 California Water Controversies

 

Water Heist: How Corporations are Cashin In on California's Water http://www.citizen.org/california/water/heist/

 

GAO REPORT:  Water Subsidies: Impact of Higher Irrigation Rates on Central Valley Project Farmers TEXT

Water Transfer Office, Department of Water Resources “Where is California Taking Water Transfers?”  http://www.watertransfers.water.ca.gov/docs/JohnsEditorialJWRPM-Vol-129-No-1Final.pdf

 

GAO REPORT:  Bureau of Reclamation: Water Marketing Activities and Costs at the Central Valley Project.  TEXT , PDF  SUMMARY

 

California’s Water Balancing Act Part 2:  Delta Blues
by Susan Zakin, High Country News  http://www.hcn.org/servlets/hcn.Article?article_id=13399

 

Colorado River

 

Copyright (c) 2000 Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University Stanford Environmental Law Journal,  January, 2000,  19 Stan. Envtl. L.J. 121,  47899 words,  ARTICLE: Undamming Glen Canyon: Lunacy, Rationality, or Prophecy?,  Scott K. Miller *

 

Colorado Water Law Overview

http://www.dividingthewaters.org/news/docs/co_waterlaw_overview.pdf

 

Jenkins, Matt.  “California’s Water Balancing Act Part 1:  The Royal Squeeze.” High Country News.  http://www.hcn.org/servlets/hcn.Article?article_id=13367

 

Anadramous Fish

 

Allendorf, Fred, and others.  1997.  “Prioritizing Pacific Salmon Stocks for Conservation.” Conservation Biology 11(1):  140-152.(JSTOR)

               

Black, Michael.  1994.  “Recounting a Century of Failed Fishery Policy Toward California's Sacramento River Salmon and Steelhead (in Special Section: Endangered Pacific Salmonids).”  Conservation Biology 8 (3):  892-894.(JSTOR)

 

Moyle, Peter B.; Jack E. Williams.  “Biodiversity Loss in the Temperate Zone: Decline of the Native Fish Fauna of California.”  Conservation Biology 4 (3):  275-284.(JSTOR)

 

Earthjustice Materials on Conservation of Northwest Salmon (good analysis of Alsea decision on hatcheries and ESU)

http://www.earthjustice.org/backgrounder/display.html?ID=28

 

Ecosystem Management

 

Grumbine, R. Edward.  1994.  “What Is Ecosystem Management?”  Conservation Biology 8(1):  27-38.

 

Policansky, David.  1998.  Science and Decision Making for Water Resources (in Invited Feature: Freshwater Systems)” Ecological Applications  8(3):  610-618.

 

Copyright (c) 2000 Virginia Environmental Law Journal Association Virginia Environmental Law Journal,  2000,  19 Va. Envtl. L.J. 121,  20485 words,  ARTICLE: PROTECTING AND PRESERVING OUR NATIONAL PARKS: THE EVERGLADES NATIONAL PARK RESTORATION PROJECT,  Richard J. Ansson, Jr.*

 

Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan

http://www.evergladesplan.org/

 

International Water Issues

 

United Nations Environment Programme, World Water Day 2003

http://www.worldwaterday.org/

 

Huisman, Pieter,  Joost de Jong and Koos Wieriks.  2000.  “Transboundary Cooperation In Shared River Basins: Experiences From The Rhine, Meuse And North Sea.”  Water Policy 2(1-2):  83-97. PDF (638 K)

 

Gleick, Peter H.  1988.  Water in Crisis: Paths to Sustainable Water Use (in Invited Feature: Freshwater Systems) Ecological Applications, Vol. 8, No. 3. (Aug., 1998), pp. 571-579.

 

Gleick, Peter H.  1993.  Water and Conflict: Fresh Water Resources and International Security (in Will Blood Flow for H20?) International Security, Vol. 18, No. 1. (Summer, 1993), pp. 79-112.

 

Gleick, Peter H. "Global Freshwater Resources: Soft-Path Solutions for the 21st Century." Science 302, no. 5650 (2003): 1524-28.

 

Mahmoud A. Abu-Zeid.  1998.  “Water And Sustainable Development: The Vision For World Water, Life And The Environment.” Water Policy 1(1):  9-19. (available from instructor)