ESP 172: Public Lands Management, Fall 2007

 

Professor Mark Lubell, TA Tavis Forrester

Email:  mnlubell@ucdavis.edu; tforrester@ucdavis.edu

Webpage:  http://www.des.ucdavis.edu/faculty/lubell/

Office Hours:  Tuesday-Thursday, 10-12pm, or by appointment; 2146 Wickson.

 

Lecture Time/Place:  T-TH 12:10-1:30pm; 202 Wellman

 202 Wellman

Section 1:  Friday, 11:00-11:50am; Olson 158

Section 2:  Friday, 12:10-1pm; Olson 158

Section 3:  Friday, 1:10-2pm; Wellman 115

 

Abstract

 

Currently, the US Federal government owns approximately 652 million acres of land (27.7% of the land).  State and local government ownership adds to that total.  Because these public lands contain some of the most important natural resources in the country, how they are managed is one of the most controversial and fascinating areas of environmental policy.  This course will review public lands management from both a theoretical and descriptive perspective.  We will discuss the political economy of public lands, the major political forces affecting public lands, and the specific details of energy policy, forests, rangelands, national parks, and wildlife on public lands.  By the end of the course, ecology students should have better idea of the political challenges they might face when trying to do science in the context of public lands, and the management implications of their research.  Public policy students should have a better idea of how the system works, in order to focus their future career or research goals. 

 

Administrative Details

 

Course grading consists of three elements: mid-term examination (25%), final examination (25%), final paper (30%), and class/section participation (20%).  The mid-term and final will focus on concepts presented in lecture, and will be a combination of short answer and multiple choice.  The 10-page paper must focus on a critical public lands issue or controversy in California (other geographic locations can be considered with instructor approval).  It should contain three main sections: 1) detailed description of issue; 2) application of relevant class materials and theoretical perspectives; 3) criticisms of current policy and policy recommendations.  The papers must include additional research resources, and the best papers will have personal interviews with real stakeholders in the issue.  Class participation requires attendance of lectures and one discussion section per week, along with contributions to discussions in both forums.  The exam times and paper due dates are as follows:

 

Midterm Examination:  Thursday, October 25, same room.

Final Examination (Code Q):  Thursday, December 13, 10:30am-12:30pm, same room

One-Page Paper Prospectus Due:  Thursday, October 18, in class

Final Paper Due:  Thursday, November 29, in class

 

Smartsite Forum Discussion:  By Thursday of each week, every student is required to log on to the Smartsite discussion forum (https://smartsite.ucdavis.edu/; you will need the same username and password as for MyUCDavis, the Kerebos password) to enter a section discussion topic based on that week's readings. You may either create a new topic/thread, or respond to an already existing thread created by another student.  The TA will select discussion the best forum questions each week to discuss in section.  If the forum entries do not demonstrate that everybody is reading outside of the lecture materials, then we will start grading the forum entries and possibly supplementing with in-section quizzes. 

 

Cheating and Late Work Policies

 

If you are caught cheating on an examination, you will receive a zero for that exam.  Given the fact that the exams are at least 25% of your grade, a zero on one exam almost guarantees you a D or F in the class unless you are perfect on the other materials.  Do not plagiarize research materials for your papers; plagiarized papers will also receive a zero.  There should be no quotes without citations, and all references should be given credit.  This includes Internet materials.  Plagiarized papers will also receive a zero.  If any cheating is egregious enough, I will report the offender to the appropriate campus authorities for disciplinary action.  Lesson:  Don’t cheat.

 

Late papers or missed exams will only be allowed with a written documentation of a medical or some other personal emergency.  Otherwise, there will be no making up exams.  If you turn in the paper late without an excuse, you will lose one letter grade for each day it is late.

 

Required Books and Readings

 

Loomis, John B.  2002.  Integrated Public Lands Management, 2nd Edition.  New York: Columbia University Press (ISBN:  02311244449)

Nienaber Clarke, Jeanne, and Daniel C. McCool.  1996. Staking Out the Terrain: Power and Performance of Natural Resource Agencies.  State University of New York.  (ISBN:  0791429466)

Wilkinson, Charles.  1993.  Crossing the Next Meridian:  Land, Water, and the Future of the West.  Covelo, CA: Island Press  (ISBN:  155963149X)

 

During some weeks, the required readings will be articles or materials available on the Internet.  There will also be recommended readings available each week, which will complement the required readings and lectures.  Many of the lectures will draw upon case study materials from these supplemental readings.  For tests, you will be responsible for the information presented in the lectures and the supporting information from the required readings.   

 

Paper Resources

 

ESP 172 Paper Guidelines:

http://www.des.ucdavis.edu/faculty/lubell/Teaching/teaching.html

 

Fun article with tips for writing good papers/essays:

http://tonydude.net/NaturalScience100/Topics/1Universe/zevilgenius.html

 

 

Week 1 (9/27):  Introduction

 

Loomis, Chapter 1, 2

Wilkinson, Chapter 1

 

Recommended Reading

 

Clawson, Marion.  1951.  Administration of Federal Lands in The Public Interest.” The Journal of Politics 13(3):  441-460. (Interesting historical perspective)

 

Greenwire: Online Environmental News Service (great for finding paper topics!)

http://www.eenews.net/Greenwire.php

 

High Country News:  Western Public Lands News (great for finding paper topics!)

http://www.hcn.org/index.jsp

 

Public Lands Map

http://www.headwatersnews.org/images/N10.jpg

 

Council on Environmental Quality:  Online Sources for Public Lands Statistics

http://ceq.eh.doe.gov/nepa/reports/statistics/00public.html

 

BLM 2005 Public Land Statistics

http://www.blm.gov/wo/st/en/res/Direct_Links_to_Publications/ann_rpt_and_pls/2006_pls_index.html

 

Week 2 (10/2, 10/4): Public Land and Natural Resource Regimes (Tuesday: In-class CPR management game)

 

Required Reading

 

Loomis, Chapter 3

Hardin, Garrett.  1968.  The Tragedy of the Commons.”  Science 162: 1243-1248.   (JSTOR)

Ciriacy-Wantrup and Richard C. Bishop, “Common Property as a Concept in Natural Resources Policy”.  Natural Resources Journal

 

Recommended Reading

Alchian, Armen A., and Harold Demsetz.  1973.  The Property Right Paradigm.”  The Journal of Economic History 33 (1):  16-27.

Lowry, Bill.  1998.  Public Provision of Intergenerational Goods: The Case of Preserved Lands.  American Journal of Political Science 42(4):  1082-1107.  (JSTOR)


Week 3 (10/9, 10/11):  Politics and Public Lands I

 

Required Reading

 

University of Colorado Law Review, Inc. Colorado Law Review,  Spring, 2001,  72 U. Colo. L. Rev. 287,  9603 words,  ARTICLE: SHAPING THE MODERN WEST: THE ROLE OF THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH n1,  John D. Leshy

 

Congressional Power: The 1995 Timber Salvage Rider

http://www.ncseonline.org/NLE/CRSreports/Forests/for-17.cfm?&CFID=12099146&CFTOKEN=60937532

 

Copyright (c) 2004 Natural Resources Journal Natural Resources JournalSummer, 2004, 44 Nat. Resources J. 687, 27125 words, ARTICLE: Administrative Rulemaking and Public Lands Conflict: The Forest Service's Roadless Rule, MARTIN NIE * (Law Review article)

 

Environmental Law Northwestern School of Law of Lewis & Clark College,  FALL, 1990,  20 Envtl. L. 681,  9948 words,  NEPA'S EFFECT ON AGENCY DECISION MAKING: ARTICLE: NEPA'S IMPACTS ON FEDERAL AGENCIES, ANTICIPATED AND UNANTICIPATED.,  BY PAUL J. CULHANE

 

Recommended Reading

A Presidential Initiative:  Clinton’s Roadless Area Moratorium

http://www.cnie.org/nle/crsreports/forests/for-33.pdf

 

Yale J. on Reg. Yale University, Winter, 1998, 15 Yale J. on Reg. 1, 24366 words, ARTICLE: Shedding Light on Chevron: An Empirical Study of the Chevron Doctrine in the U.S. Courts of Appeals,  Orin S. Kerr +

 

Fordham Environmental Law Journal,  Fall, 2000,  12 Fordham Envtl. Law J. 211,  18071 words,  NOTE: ENFORCING ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT UNDER THE NORTHWEST FOREST PLAN: THE JUDICIAL ROLE,  Lauren M. Rule

 

Journal of Law & Politics,  Winter, 1998,  14 J. L. & Politics 1,  14724 words,  ARTICLE: Congressional Review of Agency Rulemaking: The 104th Congress and the Salvage Timber Directive,  Peter A. Pfohl

 

Horwitz, Robert B. 1994.  Judicial Review of Regulatory Decisions: The Changing Criteria.”  Political Science Quarterly 109(1):  133-169.

 

Journal of Land, Resources, & Environmental Law, 2000, 20 J. Land Resources & Envtl. L. 245, 13544 words,  ARTICLE: Procedures Without Purpose: The Withering Away of the National Environmental Policy Act's Substantive Law,  Matthew J. Lindstrom, Ph.D.

 

 University of Richmond Law Review,  May, 1994,  28 U. Rich. L. Rev. 619,  27896 words,  ARTICLE: AGENCY ACTION, FINALITY AND GEOGRAPHICAL NEXUS: JUDICIAL REVIEW OF AGENCY COMPLIANCE WITH NEPA'S PROGRAMMATIC ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT REQUIREMENT AFTER LUJAN V. NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION,  Matthew C. Porterfield

 

The University of Tulsa Tulsa Law Journal,  Winter, 1996,  32 Tulsa L.J. 259,  26656 words,  THE FIFTIETH ANNIVERSARY OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT: PAST AND PROLOGUE: FIFTY YEARS WITH THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT AND JUDICIAL REVIEW REMAINS AN ENIGMA,  James C. Thomas


Week 4 (10/16, 10/18):  Politics and Public Lands II

 

Required Reading

Clarke and McCool, Chapter 1, 5, 6.

 

Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review,  November, 1996,  30 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 275,  23170 words,  COMMENT: LAW WEST OF THE PECOS: THE GROWTH OF THE WISE-USE MOVEMENT AND THE CHALLENGE TO FEDERAL PUBLIC LAND-USE POLICY,  Patrick Austin Perry *

 

“A bare-knuckled trio goes after the Forest Service.”  By Peter Aleshire, High Country News

http://www.hcn.org/servlets/hcn.Article?article_id=4040

 

Recommended Reading

 

“How the West was won, and won, and….” By Jim Wolf, High Country News

http://www.hcn.org/servlets/hcn.Article?article_id=1385

 

“DC’s green power-brokers look for a new home.”  By Phil Shabecoff, High Country News

http://www.hcn.org/servlets/hcn.Article?article_id=1446

 

***PAPER PROSPECTUS DUE, THURDAY 10/18***

 

Week 5 (10/23, 10/25): Multiple Use and Other Ideas

 

Required Reading (Nina Gordon Guest Lecture)

Loomis, Chapter 8

 

Recommended Reading

 

The Harvard Environmental Law Review,  SUMMER, 1994,  18 Harv. Envtl. L. Rev. 345,  32423 words,  ARTICLE: FEDERAL LAND MANAGEMENT IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY: FROM WISE USE TO WISE STEWARDSHIP,  SCOTT W. HARDT *

 

***MIDTERM EXAM, THURSDAY 10/25***

 

Week 6 (10/30, 11/1):  National Forests (Hugh Safford Guest Lecture, Thursday)

 

Required Reading

Loomis, Chapter 9

Wilkinson, Chapter 4

Clarke and McCool, Chapter 2 (Focus on the Forest Service section)

Vaughn, Jacqueline and Hanna J. Cortner. 2004.  "Using Parallel Strategies to Promote Change:  Forest Policymaking Under George W. Bush."  Review of Policy Research 21(6): 767-782.

 


 

Recommended Reading

 

Office of Technology Assessment. 1992.  Forest Service Planning:  Accomodating Uses, Producing Outputs, and Sustaining Ecosystems (note: This is a great report!)

http://www.wws.princeton.edu/cgi-bin/byteserv.prl/~ota/disk1/1992/9216/9216.PDF

 

Congressional Research Service.  1995.  Below-Cost Timber Sales: Overview.

http://www.ncseonline.org/NLE/CRSreports/forests/for-1.cfm

 

Congressional Research Service.  1995.  Forest Service Timber Sale Practices and Procedures:  Analysis of Alternative Systems.

http://www.ncseonline.org/nle/crsreports/forests/for-14.cfm?&CFID=16761769&CFTOKEN=30797370

 

Sabatier, Paul A., John Loomis, Catherine McCarthy. 1995. “Hierarchical Controls, Professional Norms, Local Constituencies, and Budget Maximization: An Analysis of U.S. Forest Service Planning Decisions.”  American Journal of Political Science 39:204-242 (JSTOR)

Burnett, Miles and Charles Davis.  2002.  "Getting Out the Cut: Politics and National Forest Timber Harvests, 1960-1995."  Administration & Society 34:  202-228.(use Google scholar to search for this one; not a persistent link)

 

Clawson, Marion.  1976. “The National Forests.  Science  191 (4228):  762-767.

 

National Forest Timber Harvest Data

http://www.fs.fed.us/forestmanagement/reports/index.shtml

 

Brian Kent; B. Bruce Bare; Richard C. Field; Gordon A. Bradley. 1991. "Natural Resource Land Management Planning using Large-Scale Linear Programs: The USDA Forest Service Experience with Forplan." Operations Research 39(1):  13-27.

 

Copyright (c) 2006 Lewis & Clark Law School Environmental LawSpring, 2006, 36 Envtl. L. 301, 43417 words, ARTICLE: THE LAW OF FIRE: RESHAPING PUBLIC LAND POLICY IN AN ERA OF ECOLOGY AND LITIGATION, By Robert B. Keiter*

 

Week 7:  Public Rangelands (11/6, 11/8)

 

Required Reading

 

Loomis, Chapter 10

Wilkinson, Chapter 3

Clarke and McCool, Chapter 4

Fleischner, Thomas L.  1994.  Ecological Costs of Livestock Grazing in Western North America.”  Conservation Biology 8(3):  629-644 (JSTOR)

 

Recommended Reading

 

Land and Water Law Review,  1997,  32 Land & Water L. Rev. 345,  2976 words,  FIFTY YEARS OF BLM: ESSAY: THE BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT: A HALF-CENTRUY OF CHALLENGES AND CHANGE,  Al Pierson *

Colorado Law Review,  Spring, 1998,  69 U. Colo. L. Rev. 633,  28436 words,  COMMENT: PUBLIC RANGELAND REFORM: NEW PROSPECTS FOR COLLABORATION AND LOCAL CONTROL USING THE RESOURCE ADVISORY COUNCILS,  Todd M. Olinger

Colorado Law Review,  Spring, 2002,  73 U. Colo. L. Rev. 413,  38864 words,  ARTICLE: SUSTAINING GEOGRAPHIES OF HOPE: CULTURAL RESOURCES ON PUBLIC LANDS,  Sandra B. Zellmer*

“Assessing the Full Cost of the Grazing Program”; Center for Biological Diversity

http://www.sw-center.org/swcbd/Programs/grazing/Assessing_the_full_cost.pdf

 

GAO Report:  Livestock Grazing—Federal Expenditures and Receipts Vary (REALLY GOOD REPORT!)

http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d05869.pdf

 

Copyright (c) 2004 Lewis & Clark Law School Environmental LawFall, 2004, 34 Envtl. L. 1123, 9181 words, SYMPOSIUM: PUBLIC LANDS MANAGEMENT AT THE CROSSROADS: BALANCING INTERESTS IN THE 21st CENTURY: SYMPOSIUM ARTICLE: RIDE 'EM COWBOY: A CRITICAL LOOK AT BLM'S PROPOSED NEW GRAZING REGULATIONS, By Joseph M. Feller* (keyword: Grazing Regulations)

 

Center for Biological Diversity Grazing Fee Petition (Pro-enviro, but lots of good info)

http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/swcbd/programs/grazing/GrazingFeePetition.pdf

 

"Hot Range Topics", University of Idaho

http://www.cnr.uidaho.edu/range456/hot-topics/federal-permit.htm#Summary

 

Week 8:  Parks and Wilderness (11/13, 11/15)

 

Required Reading

 

Loomis, Chapter 12

Clarke and McCool, Chapter 3 (National Park Service section)

Cole, David. 2003.  "Agency Policy and the Resolution of Wilderness Stewardship Dilemmas."  The George Wright Forum.

 

Recommended Reading

 

Nash, Roderick.  1970.  The American Invention of National Parks.” American Quarterly 22 (3):  726-735. (JSTOR)

Noss, Reed F.  1991.  Sustainability and Wilderness.”  Conservation Biology 5 (1): 120-122. (JSTOR)

CRS Report:  Wilderness—Overview and Statistics

 

Journal of Land, Resources, & Environmental Law,  2001,  21 J. Land Resources & Envtl. L. 219,  43218 words,  THE STATE OF THE LAW: The Wilderness Act of 1964: A Practitioner's Guide *

 

Cornell Law Review,  September, 2002,  87 Cornell L. Rev. 1333,  37524 words,  ARTICLE: PRESERVING MONUMENTAL LANDSCAPES UNDER THE ANTIQUITIES ACT,  Christine A. Klein+

 

 

Week 9: Mining and Energy (11/20,  11/22--T-Giving No Class on Thursday)

 

Required Reading

 

Wilkinson, Chapter 2

Congressional Research Service Report, 2005.  "Mining on Federal Lands"

Congressional Research Service Report 2004 "Oil and Gas Exploration and Development on Public Lands"

 

Recommended Reading

 

Who Owns the West? Oil and Gas Leases.  Report by the Environmental Working Group

http://www.ewg.org/oil_and_gas/part2.php

 

Tulsa Law Journal,  Spring / Summer, 1998,  33 Tulsa L.J. 765,  43648 words,  MINERAL LAW SYMPOSIUM: ARTICLE: Hardrock Minerals, Energy Minerals, and Other Resources on the Public Lands: The Evolution of Federal Natural Resources Law,  Robert L. Glicksman+ and George Cameron Coggins++

 

BLM: Inventory of Energy Resources on Federal Public Lands (great source of stats!)

http://www.blm.gov/epca/

 

 

Week 10(11/27, 11/29): Wildlife and Ecosystems

 

Loomis, Chapter 11, 13

Clarke and McCool, Chapter 3 (Fish and Wildlife Service section)

Grumbine, R. Edward.  1994.  What Is Ecosystem Management?  Conservation Biology 8(1):  27-38.

 

Recommended Reading

 

Curtin, Charles G.  The Evolution of the U.S. National Wildlife Refuge System and the Doctrine of Compatibility.”  Conservation Biology 7 (1):  29-38. (JSTOR)

Keiter, Robert B., and Harvey Locke.  1996.  Law and Large Carnivore Conservation in the Rocky Mountains of the U.S. and Canada.” Conservation Biology 10(4):  1003-1012. (JSTOR)

Primm, Steven A., and Tim W. Clark.  1996.  Making Sense of the Policy Process for Carnivore Conservation.”  Conservation Biology 10(4):  1036-1045.(JSTOR)

 

Power, Thomas Michael.  1991. “Ecosystem Preservation and the Economy in the Greater Yellowstone Area.”  Conservation Biology 5 (3):  395-404.

 

Clark, Tim W., Elizabeth Dawn Amato, Donald G. Whittemore, Ann H. Harvey.  1991.  Policy and Programs for Ecosystem Management in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem: An Analysis.”  Conservation Biology 5(3):  412-422.

 

***FINAL PAPER DUE, Thursday 11/29***

 

Week 11 (12/4, 12/6):  The New West, Conclusion, Errata

 

Required Reading

 

Hansen, Andrew j., et al. 2002.   "Ecological Causes and Consequences of Demographic Change in the New West" BioScience 52: 151-162.

Shumway JM, and Otterstrom SM.  2001.  "Spatial patterns of migration and income change in the mountain West: The dominance of service-based, amenity-rich counties." 
Professional Geographer 53 (4): 492-502

 

 

***FINAL EXAMINATION:  THURSDAY 12/13, 10:30am-12:30pm***